ambien used as antidepressant buy ambien online ambien taken off market

tamsulosin hydrochloride and tramadol tramadol 50mg difference between tramadol and metacam

does tramadol give positive drug screen tramadol online overnight is it possible to get high on tramadol

get ambien Peoria buy ambien online can ambien increase depression

tramadol retarda la eyaculacion tramadol 50 mg nubain and tramadol

Who We Are 2018-11-05T12:25:18+03:00

Our History

The ideas that would later on lead to the formation of NEPHAK can be traced to the mid 1990s. This was after it was realized that such a network was needed to unite the then existing support groups and networks of PLHAs in Kenya. By 1998, the first meeting and consultations that led to the establishment of NEPHAK became a reality. In fact, the first existence of a national PLHAs network has been recorded early 1998. Back then, NEPHAK stood for Network of PLHAs in Kenya. It was later towards the end of 1998 that the term national was added to the network to give the full name then: National Network of PLHAs in Kenya (NEPHAK).

Official records confirm that NEPHAK, as the National Network of PLHAs in Kenya (NEPHAK) was being hosted and coordinated with support of the National AIDS Steering Committee that would later become the National AIDS and STIs Control Programme (NASCOP). NASCOP even hosted the network between 1998 to early 2000 when the network moved out to be hosted by Women Fighting AIDS in Kenya (WOFAK). WOFAK, founded by Dorothy Onyango had been one of the first PLHA – led organizations to be established in Kenya alongside the Know AIDS Society (KAS), founded by Joe Muriuki and the Kenya Network of Women with AIDS (established in 1993 by Asunta Wagura) and The Association of people with AIDS in Kenya (TAPWAK) by Rowlands Lenya. As such, Know AIDS Society (KAS), established in 1985 was the first known PLHA support group to exist in Kenya. Joe Muriuki and later, Rowlands Lenya were the two key leaders of KAS. Lenya who until his death in 2009 was the Executive Director of The Association of People with AIDS in Kenya (TAPWAK) and Joe Muriuki were the first Kenyans to go public about their HIV status in 1985. TAPWAK was established in 1988.

By the time the Government of Kenya was declaring HIV and AIDS a national disaster in 1999, the PLHAs movement in Kenya had started establishing itself. People living with HIV and AIDS (then AIDS existed) were therefore present during the formation of the National AIDs Control Committee that would later graduate into the National AIDS Control Council (NACC). Declaration of HIV and AIDS as a national disaster and subsequent establishment of the National AIDS Control Council gave hope and courage to those who were infected with HIV. Subsequently, hundreds of support groups were established in all parts of the country thereby indicating the urgency and rational for a national network of PLHAs. NEPHAK therefore had room to operate and work to do.

At inception, NEPHAK committed to work for greater and meaningful involvement of PLHIV in the HIV response and to act as a positive force for change and bringing together PLHIV to have a common voice and purpose. The size and scope of the challenges facing NEPHAK in realizing these goals should not be under estimated. HIV – associated stigma was at its peak and there was no known treatment for HIV.

As expected, the young network was to face leadership, management and governance challenges. The formation and growth of NEPHAK was inhibited because of these challenges and by year 2000, a Task Force was established to spearhead the re-formation of NEPHAK. It was out of the leadership wrangles and the squabbles that one wing of NEPHAK would add the term ‘Empowerment’ in their name to distinguish the genuine NEPHAK from the other national networks. During this time, NEPHAK would either mean Network of PLHAs in Kenya (NEPHAK) or the National Network of PLHAs in Kenya (NEPHAK). There were fights and confusion over the name NEPHAK and one group even came up with the name NEPLAK just to distinguish themselves from the rest. Nevertheless, during these wrangles, the name NEPHAK had already become a household name among PLHAs and a recognized name in the national response to HIV and AIDS. In fact, the fight over the name NEPHAK was because the name was popular in Kenya and beyond.

NEPHAK as it is today emerged out of the progressive PLHAs leadership who were also supported with other partners and stakeholders to work towards a credible national network of PLHAs. PLHAs leadership and partners then worked through Task Forces and one such task force consisted of representatives from key PLHIV organizations and stakeholders who worked to establish an institutional framework, preparation of the constitution, establishment of the Secretariat, preparation of a strategic plan and the development of programs. With little capacity to implement activities and teething problems associated with new member organizations, NEPHAK had challenges functioning effectively and it did not take long before the challenges emerged again. A second Task Force was set up in 2002 to continue with the tasks of the first task force.

The second Task Force was also to oversee the institutionalization and operationalization of the strategies and systems developed by the first Task Force. With the support of the members, the Task Force successfully organized the first ever National PLHIV Conference in August 2002. During the Conference, the first National Committee of Representatives (the Board) was elected, and an amended constitution was ratified by the Delegates. The constitution, among other things, established organs of governance including National Delegates Conference, the Board and the Secretariat. The Task Force also prepared a revised strategy for revitalizing the network; and prepared advocacy strategy, public relations strategy and publicity materials, and proposed institutional review. This institutional review was later implemented as Organizational Self Assessment (OSA).

The network was finally registered as a non-governmental organization (NGO) in 2003 and a Secretariat established and in 2004, the network held its 2nd National Delegates Conference (NDC) and a new board elected to steer the network and provide oversight to the secretariat. NEPHAK Secretariat was very successful in fulfilling the vision and goals of the network during 2004 and 2007. In 2007, a new board was elected after the 3rd National Delegates Conference and this also came with challenges.

Between 2007 and 2009 NEPHAK faced a series of internal leadership management and governance challenges and the networks credibility and work suffered a great deal. After consultations with key PLHAs leaders in Kenya and a number of partners, a comprehensive Institutional Assessment out of the network was undertaken in 2009 with support of the National AIDS Control Council (NACC) and the Joint United Nations Programme on AIDS (UNAIDS). This assessment found that the governance structure at NEPHAK was lacking clear accountability and clarity of roles between various organizational organs. The main challenge according to the assessment report was the lack of clarity between the role of the board and the role of the secretariat. The Institutional Assessment set forth a wide range of recommendations which if successfully implemented, would lead to the desired organizational maturity and reposition NEPHAK to its once formidable past and allow the network to play its role and mandate to the national response to TB and HIV and AIDS in Kenya. In much of 2010, NEPHAK leadership with the support from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) started working on the organizational development and systems strengthening (ODSS) initiatives as recommended by the institutional assessment.

Notable progress was made by NEPHAK under the FANIKISHA Institutional Strengthening Project supported by USAID and managed by the Management Sciences for Health (MSH). Under this project, NEPHAK developed policies, guidelines and strategies that continue to steer the organization. The network also unveiled a new constitution.


Healthy Communities.


To Contribute to Quality health and well being of Communities.


Sustained Improvement of health and well-being of People living with, at risk of and affected by HIV and related comorbidities

Our Values

Since inception, NEPHAK has been guided by the following principles:

  1. Promoting community participation and ownership:

Community initiatives and programmes are more successful when the community members are involved in their planning and implementation. Increased participation also promotes sustainability through commitment and ownership by the community.

2. Enhancing strategic partnerships

Formation of networks is at the core of NEPHAK’s partnership building. Strategic partnerships support communities to achieve much more than they would on their own.

3. Promoting human rights and diversity

NEPHAK believes that health is a basic human right and adheres to rights based approaches (RBAs) in its work and operations. Respect to human rights and non-discrimination based on status, gender, tribe or any other basis are crucial for healthy and positive living.

4. Accountability and Transparency

NEPHAK believes in honest communication, openness and transparent use of resources. Programmes and costs are planned and reviewed carefully to ensure efficient and effective use of resources and the highest return to those served. Members and staff will remain accountable in all their activities and will operate in a transparent manner.


The NEPHAK Board is made up of 11 Members: 7 Directors elected at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), one Director retained from the previous board, two co-opted directors and the Executive Director; the three have no voting rights. The Board members are elected to serve for a period of three years and are eligible to run for or be retained for a second maximum term.

The Board is responsible for overall governance of the Network, for developing new policies, and for approval of plans and strategies. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Board are as below:

a) Make, promote and interpret policies or rules that govern practices deemed expedient for the management of the affairs of the Network; and provide guidelines to the Secretariat for the implementation of the policies.

b) Provide guidance and direction on the development of the strategic plan; approve the strategic plan, annual operating plans, and budgets.

c) Monitor and maintain oversight of the management and implementation mandate of the Secretariat; receive and review technical reports/proposals relating to programs/studies and operations, and make policy decisions, and direct or advise the Secretariat as appropriate.

d) Establish and delegate duties to sub-committees of the Board as need arises Oversee the preparation of the AGM and AGM; ensure the Secretariat adequately coordinates the implementation of the policies sanctioned by the members at the AGM or Special AGM.

e) Appoint, monitor, appraise and terminate the services of the Executive Director; and determine his/her remuneration.

f) Approve appointment and termination of senior management team members.

g) Protect and preserve the integrity of the Network.

h) Appoint standing committees, technical task forces, ad-hoc committees or specialized committees as need arises.

i) Approval of admission of new members.

j) Receive and approve audited accounts before submission to the Annual General Meeting.

NEPHAK Board discharges its operations through four (4) standing committees namely: Policy and Strategy Committee; Finance and Accountability Committee; Resource Mobilization Committee; and Audit and Risk Committee. In addition, the Board may, from time to time, appoint technical task forces, ad-hoc committees, or specialised committees for a specific purpose from among its members and any other co-opted expertise. Such technical task forces, ad-hoc committees, or specialised committees so appointed shall be given a clear mandate and time frame within which to undertake the assigned tasks and shall stand dissolved upon the finalisation of their tasks. In constituting technical task forces, ad-hoc committees, or special committees, the Board shall have the power to draw the membership from among its voting and non-voting members and may co-opt professionals as deemed appropriate.

The Board Members are:

  1. Irene Sarah Murunga Nangeni – Chairperson
  2. Jectone Chillo – Vice Chairperson
  3. Margaret Mwangi – Treasurer
  4. Leah Kamau – Member (Representing Key Population)
  5. Peter Odenyo – Member (Retained)
  6. Cecilia Asaji – Member
  7. Gladys Lagat – Member
  8. Nelly Mwania – Member (Representing Adolescents & Youth)
  9. Melba Katsivo Katindi – Member
  10. Peter Kimutai – Co Opted
  11. Nelson Juma Otwoma – Secretary (Executive Director)